XL Motion, SPACE & Nettuno Automation Containers vs. Logistic Packaging AKL Range

Introduction: Competing Solutions for Automated Storage Systems

In modern intralogistics and ASRS (Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems), the right container is critical for throughput, dimensional accuracy, and conveyor compatibility.
Container families such as XL Motion, SPACE, and Nettuno are widely recognized in European shuttle and mini-load warehouses for their precise geometry, low-noise performance, and robotic handling stability.

However, the Logistic Packaging AKL container range delivers equivalent or superior automation performance — with broader footprint compatibility, custom base configurations, and optimized total cost for industrial projects.

XL Motion Containers – Engineered for Low-Noise Automation

The XL Motion series includes Euronorm automation containers (600×400 and 650×450 mm) designed for high-speed conveyors and robotic shuttle systems.
These containers feature reinforced bases, smooth interior walls, and sound-dampened treads for quiet, stable operation on roller conveyors.

Technical profile:

• External sizes: 600×400 mm and 650×450 mm
• Heights: 120 / 170 / 220 / 270 / 320 / 420 mm
• Volume range: 21 to 83 liters
• Load capacity: up to 50 kg per container
• Stacking load: up to 250 kg
• Wide running surface for improved conveyor tracking and reduced vibration

LP Equivalent Solutions

• LP-AKL-6432 – 600×400×320 mm with optional miniload or sandwich base for vibration damping and rigidity.
• LP-AKL-6422 – 600×400×220 mm, ideal for ASRS shuttle storage and automated picking lines.

LP AKL advantages over XL Motion:
✔ Available in PPC or ESD conductive materials
✔ Smooth, ribbed, or sandwich bases for noise and deflection control
✔ Fully compatible with Euro conveyors and shuttle racking
✔ Recyclable design and robotic gripper-optimized rims

SPACE Containers – Italian Precision for Shuttle and ASRS Systems

The SPACE automation container series is engineered for high-frequency handling and long-term use in shuttle warehouses and robotic systems.
These containers are known for bottom stiffness, controlled deflection, and load stability, with several base types for different conveyor speeds and weight profiles.

Technical profile:

• Base footprints: 600×400 mm and 650×450 mm
• Bottom types and performance:
• Smooth bottom – 20 kg load, 200 kg stack
• Reinforced bottom – 50 kg load, 300 kg stack, ≤ 5 mm deflection
• Sandwich bottom – up to 120 kg load, 300 kg stack, ≤ 1–5 mm deflection

• Features: closed handles, IML label surface, RFID and barcode integration, drainage holes

LP Equivalent Solutions

• LP-AKL-6545-32 – 650×450×320 mm, heavy-duty reinforced bottom for conveyors and shuttles.
• LP-AKL-6545-27 – 650×450×270 mm, ideal for ASRS mini-load racks.

Why choose LP AKL instead of SPACE containers:
✔ Wider footprint range (from 400×300 mm up to 800×600 mm)
✔ Identical base technologies (smooth, ribbed, sandwich)
✔ Full compatibility with Euro pallets and pallet covers
✔ Long service life in closed logistics loops

Nettuno Automation Trays – Flat Bases for Conveyor and Shuttle Lines

The Nettuno line consists of flat automation trays developed for shuttle and conveyor transport systems where stability, flatness, and low deflection are critical.
These trays are often used in component assembly, electronics distribution, and high-density automated warehouses.

Typical characteristics:

• Base: 600×400 mm
• Height: 60–70 mm
• Reinforced ribbed base, optimized for robotic gripping and sensor-guided movement
• Designed for hybrid use — manual handling + automated conveyors

LP Equivalent Solutions

• LP-AKL-6443-04 Automation Tray – 638×424×60 mm, smooth ribbed bottom, ideal for cartons, totes, and small parts on conveyors.
• LP-AKL-6427 – multi-purpose container, stackable and compatible with mixed automation environments.

LP AKL benefits compared to Nettuno:
✔ Universal design for trays and containers
✔ Optional label holders and barcode zones
✔ Seamless integration between manual and automated areas

Comparative Technical Overview

Share